From 54af6233d1cb84cdfaa6ea44ea0db0bcf518baac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Piggin Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:58:10 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] JFS is missing a memory barrier JFS is missing a memory barrier needed to close the critical section before clearing the lock bit. Use lock bitops for this. unlock_page() has a second barrier after clearing the lock, which is required because it checks whether the waitqueue is active without locks. Such a barrier is not required here because the waitqueue spinlock is always taken (something to think about if performance is an issue). Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp --- fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c index b27fa117f229..1dfaae5adf1b 100644 --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c @@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ static struct { #endif #define metapage_locked(mp) test_bit(META_locked, &(mp)->flag) -#define trylock_metapage(mp) test_and_set_bit(META_locked, &(mp)->flag) +#define trylock_metapage(mp) test_and_set_bit_lock(META_locked, &(mp)->flag) static inline void unlock_metapage(struct metapage *mp) { - clear_bit(META_locked, &mp->flag); + clear_bit_unlock(META_locked, &mp->flag); wake_up(&mp->wait); } -- GitLab