From 4b62c0f1e76fe3327b695c49195af8b58e4da057 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:35:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sh: No need to explicitly include <linux/rwlock.h>. Since <linux/spinlock.h> already includes <linux/rwlock.h>, and the latter file will warn about not having included the former file anyway, there is no value in including rwlock.h explicitly. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> --- arch/sh/mm/pmb.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c index 198bcff5e96f..35b364f931ea 100644 --- a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c +++ b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> -#include <linux/rwlock.h> #include <asm/sizes.h> #include <asm/system.h> #include <asm/uaccess.h> -- GitLab