提交 42874b3d 编写于 作者: M Miao Xie 提交者: Chris Mason

Btrfs: fix the snapshot that should not exist

The snapshot should be the image of the fs tree before it was created,
so the metadata of the snapshot should not exist in the its tree. But now, we
found the directory item and directory name index is in both the snapshot tree
and the fs tree. It introduces some problems and makes the users feel strange:

 # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda1
 # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
 # mkdir /mnt/1
 # cd /mnt/1
 # btrfs subvolume snapshot /mnt snap0
 # ls -a /mnt/1/snap0/1
 .	..	[no other file/dir]

 # ll /mnt/1/snap0/
 total 0
 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10 Ju1 24 12:11 1
			^^^
			There is no file/dir in it, but it's size is 10

 # cd /mnt/1/snap0/1/snap0
 [Enter a unexisted directory successfully...]

There is nothing in the directory 1 in snap0, but btrfs told the length of
this directory is 10. Beside that, we can enter an unexisted directory, it is
very strange to the users.

 # btrfs subvolume snapshot /mnt/1/snap0 /mnt/snap1
 # ll /mnt/1/snap0/1/
 total 0
 [None]
 # ll /mnt/snap1/1/
 total 0
 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Ju1 24 12:14 snap0

And the source of snap1 did have any directory in Directory 1, but snap1 have
a snap0, it is different between the source and the snapshot.

So I think we should insert directory item and directory name index and update
the parent inode as the last step of snapshot creation, and do not leave the
useless metadata in the file tree.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
上级 66d8f3dd
......@@ -955,6 +955,8 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *parent_root;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv;
struct inode *parent_inode;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_dir_item *dir_item;
struct dentry *parent;
struct dentry *dentry;
struct extent_buffer *tmp;
......@@ -967,6 +969,12 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 root_flags;
uuid_le new_uuid;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path) {
ret = pending->error = -ENOMEM;
goto path_alloc_fail;
}
new_root_item = kmalloc(sizeof(*new_root_item), GFP_NOFS);
if (!new_root_item) {
ret = pending->error = -ENOMEM;
......@@ -1015,23 +1023,20 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
*/
ret = btrfs_set_inode_index(parent_inode, &index);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
ret = btrfs_insert_dir_item(trans, parent_root,
dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len,
parent_inode, &key,
BTRFS_FT_DIR, index);
if (ret == -EEXIST) {
/* check if there is a file/dir which has the same name. */
dir_item = btrfs_lookup_dir_item(NULL, parent_root, path,
btrfs_ino(parent_inode),
dentry->d_name.name,
dentry->d_name.len, 0);
if (dir_item != NULL && !IS_ERR(dir_item)) {
pending->error = -EEXIST;
goto fail;
} else if (ret) {
} else if (IS_ERR(dir_item)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(dir_item);
goto abort_trans;
}
btrfs_i_size_write(parent_inode, parent_inode->i_size +
dentry->d_name.len * 2);
parent_inode->i_mtime = parent_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, parent_root, parent_inode);
if (ret)
goto abort_trans;
btrfs_release_path(path);
/*
* pull in the delayed directory update
......@@ -1123,12 +1128,30 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, root, (unsigned long)-1);
if (ret)
goto abort_trans;
ret = btrfs_insert_dir_item(trans, parent_root,
dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len,
parent_inode, &key,
BTRFS_FT_DIR, index);
/* We have check then name at the beginning, so it is impossible. */
BUG_ON(ret == -EEXIST);
if (ret)
goto abort_trans;
btrfs_i_size_write(parent_inode, parent_inode->i_size +
dentry->d_name.len * 2);
parent_inode->i_mtime = parent_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, parent_root, parent_inode);
if (ret)
goto abort_trans;
fail:
dput(parent);
trans->block_rsv = rsv;
no_free_objectid:
kfree(new_root_item);
root_item_alloc_fail:
btrfs_free_path(path);
path_alloc_fail:
btrfs_block_rsv_release(root, &pending->block_rsv, (u64)-1);
return ret;
......@@ -1472,13 +1495,28 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
*/
mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->reloc_mutex);
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_items(trans, root);
/*
* We needn't worry about the delayed items because we will
* deal with them in create_pending_snapshot(), which is the
* core function of the snapshot creation.
*/
ret = create_pending_snapshots(trans, root->fs_info);
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->reloc_mutex);
goto cleanup_transaction;
}
ret = create_pending_snapshots(trans, root->fs_info);
/*
* We insert the dir indexes of the snapshots and update the inode
* of the snapshots' parents after the snapshot creation, so there
* are some delayed items which are not dealt with. Now deal with
* them.
*
* We needn't worry that this operation will corrupt the snapshots,
* because all the tree which are snapshoted will be forced to COW
* the nodes and leaves.
*/
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_items(trans, root);
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->reloc_mutex);
goto cleanup_transaction;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册