提交 34093d05 编写于 作者: J Julien Brunel 提交者: David S. Miller

net/rxrpc: Use an IS_ERR test rather than a NULL test

In case of error, the function rxrpc_get_transport returns an ERR
pointer, but never returns a NULL pointer. So after a call to this
function, a NULL test should be replaced by an IS_ERR test.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is
as follows: 
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>
@correct_null_test@
expression x,E;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x =  rxrpc_get_transport(...)
<... when != x = E
if (
(
- x@p2 != NULL
+ ! IS_ERR ( x )
|
- x@p2 == NULL
+ IS_ERR( x )
)
 )
S1
else S2
...>
? x = E;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulien Brunel <brunel@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 317900cb
......@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int rxrpc_accept_incoming_call(struct rxrpc_local *local,
trans = rxrpc_get_transport(local, peer, GFP_NOIO);
rxrpc_put_peer(peer);
if (!trans) {
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
_debug("no trans");
ret = -EBUSY;
goto error;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册