提交 1dfc3068 编写于 作者: A Arnd Bergmann 提交者: Shile Zhang

io_uring: use __kernel_timespec in timeout ABI

commit bdf200731145f07a6127cb16753e2e8fdc159cf4 upstream.

All system calls use struct __kernel_timespec instead of the old struct
timespec, but this one was just added with the old-style ABI. Change it
now to enforce the use of __kernel_timespec, avoiding ABI confusion and
the need for compat handlers on 32-bit architectures.

Any user space caller will have to use __kernel_timespec now, but this
is unambiguous and works for any C library regardless of the time_t
definition. A nicer way to specify the timeout would have been a less
ambiguous 64-bit nanosecond value, but I suppose it's too late now to
change that as this would impact both 32-bit and 64-bit users.

Fixes: 5262f567987d ("io_uring: IORING_OP_TIMEOUT support")
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
上级 9c543678
......@@ -1891,15 +1891,15 @@ static int io_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
unsigned count, req_dist, tail_index;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct list_head *entry;
struct timespec ts;
struct timespec64 ts;
if (unlikely(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
return -EINVAL;
if (sqe->flags || sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index || sqe->timeout_flags ||
sqe->len != 1)
return -EINVAL;
if (copy_from_user(&ts, (void __user *) (unsigned long) sqe->addr,
sizeof(ts)))
if (get_timespec64(&ts, u64_to_user_ptr(sqe->addr)))
return -EFAULT;
/*
......@@ -1933,7 +1933,7 @@ static int io_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
hrtimer_init(&req->timeout.timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
req->timeout.timer.function = io_timeout_fn;
hrtimer_start(&req->timeout.timer, timespec_to_ktime(ts),
hrtimer_start(&req->timeout.timer, timespec64_to_ktime(ts),
HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册