提交 0fc1d2e9 编写于 作者: A Arik Nemtsov 提交者: John W. Linville

wl12xx/wl18xx: use a dynamic PS timeout of 1.5sec

It seems some parties have bad user experience when smaller values
are used. This should have little implications for power consumption,
since traffic is bursty in nature.
Signed-off-by: NArik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
上级 091185d6
......@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static struct wlcore_conf wl12xx_conf = {
.psm_entry_retries = 8,
.psm_exit_retries = 16,
.psm_entry_nullfunc_retries = 3,
.dynamic_ps_timeout = 200,
.dynamic_ps_timeout = 1500,
.forced_ps = false,
.keep_alive_interval = 55000,
.max_listen_interval = 20,
......
......@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static struct wlcore_conf wl18xx_conf = {
.psm_entry_retries = 8,
.psm_exit_retries = 16,
.psm_entry_nullfunc_retries = 3,
.dynamic_ps_timeout = 200,
.dynamic_ps_timeout = 1500,
.forced_ps = false,
.keep_alive_interval = 55000,
.max_listen_interval = 20,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册