rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate

Use previously introduced list_entry_rcu instead of an open-coded
list_entry + rcu_dereference combination.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
LKML-Reference: <20090414181715.GA3634@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

include/linux/sched.h

@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct sched_param {
 #include <linux/proportions.h>
 #include <linux/seccomp.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
 
 #include <linux/time.h>
@@ -2010,7 +2011,8 @@ static inline unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p,
 }
 #endif
 
-#define next_task(p)	list_entry(rcu_dereference((p)->tasks.next), struct task_struct, tasks)
+#define next_task(p) \
+	list_entry_rcu((p)->tasks.next, struct task_struct, tasks)
 
 #define for_each_process(p) \
 	for (p = &init_task ; (p = next_task(p)) != &init_task ; )
@@ -2049,7 +2051,7 @@ int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
 
 static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	return list_entry(rcu_dereference(p->thread_group.next),
+	return list_entry_rcu(p->thread_group.next,
 			      struct task_struct, thread_group);
 }
 

ipc/sem.c

@@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		int i;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		un = list_entry(rcu_dereference(ulp->list_proc.next),
+		un = list_entry_rcu(ulp->list_proc.next,
 				    struct sem_undo, list_proc);
 		if (&un->list_proc == &ulp->list_proc)
 			semid = -1;

security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void *ima_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 	 * against concurrent list-extension
 	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	qe = list_entry(rcu_dereference(qe->later.next),
+	qe = list_entry_rcu(qe->later.next,
 			    struct ima_queue_entry, later);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	(*pos)++;

security/smack/smackfs.c

@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	m = list_entry(rcu_dereference(smk_netlbladdr_list.next),
+	m = list_entry_rcu(smk_netlbladdr_list.next,
 			   struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
 
 	/* the comparison '>' is a bit hacky, but works */
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
 			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
 			return;
 		}
-		m_next = list_entry(rcu_dereference(m->list.next),
+		m_next = list_entry_rcu(m->list.next,
 					struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
 		if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m_next->smk_mask.s_addr) {
 			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);