to #26323588

commit 3030fd4cb783377eca0e2a3eee63724a5c66ee15 upstream.

Andres reports that buffered IO seems to suck up more cycles than we
would like, and he narrowed it down to the fact that the io-wq workers
will briefly spin for more work on completion of a work item. This was
a win on the networking side, but apparently some other cases take a
hit because of it. Remove the optimization to avoid burning more CPU
than we have to for disk IO.
Reported-by: NAndres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>