提交 724b511d 编写于 作者: J Junio C Hamano

merge-recursive: conflicting rename case.

This changes the way the case two branches rename the same path
to different paths is handled.  Earlier, the code removed the
original path and added both destinations to the index at
stage0.  This commit changes it to leave the original path at
stage1, and two destination paths at stage2 and stage3,
respectively.

[jc: I am not really sure if this makes much difference in the
real life merge situations.  What should happen when our branch
renames A to B and M to N, while their branch renames A to M?
That is, M remains in our tree as is.]
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
上级 c8941686
......@@ -283,12 +283,20 @@ def updateFileExt(sha, mode, path, updateCache, updateWd):
def setIndexStages(path,
oSHA1, oMode,
aSHA1, aMode,
bSHA1, bMode):
bSHA1, bMode,
clear=True):
istring = []
if clear:
istring.append("0 " + ("0" * 40) + "\t" + path + "\0")
if oMode:
istring.append("%o %s %d\t%s\0" % (oMode, oSHA1, 1, path))
if aMode:
istring.append("%o %s %d\t%s\0" % (aMode, aSHA1, 2, path))
if bMode:
istring.append("%o %s %d\t%s\0" % (bMode, bSHA1, 3, path))
runProgram(['git-update-index', '-z', '--index-info'],
input="0 " + ("0" * 40) + "\t" + path + "\0" + \
"%o %s %d\t%s\0" % (oMode, oSHA1, 1, path) + \
"%o %s %d\t%s\0" % (aMode, aSHA1, 2, path) + \
"%o %s %d\t%s\0" % (bMode, bSHA1, 3, path))
input="".join(istring))
def removeFile(clean, path):
updateCache = cacheOnly or clean
......@@ -570,7 +578,7 @@ def processRenames(renamesA, renamesB, branchNameA, branchNameB):
continue
ren1.processed = True
removeFile(True, ren1.srcName)
if ren2:
# Renamed in 1 and renamed in 2
assert(ren1.srcName == ren2.srcName)
......@@ -598,13 +606,19 @@ def processRenames(renamesA, renamesB, branchNameA, branchNameB):
'adding as', dstName2, 'instead.')
removeFile(False, ren2.dstName)
else:
dstName2 = ren1.dstName
dstName2 = ren2.dstName
setIndexStages(dstName1,
None, None,
ren1.dstSha, ren1.dstMode,
None, None)
setIndexStages(dstName2,
None, None,
None, None,
ren2.dstSha, ren2.dstMode)
# NEEDSWORK: place dstNameA at stage 2 and dstNameB at stage 3
# What about other stages???
updateFile(False, ren1.dstSha, ren1.dstMode, dstName1)
updateFile(False, ren2.dstSha, ren2.dstMode, dstName2)
else:
removeFile(True, ren1.srcName)
[resSha, resMode, clean, merge] = \
mergeFile(ren1.srcName, ren1.srcSha, ren1.srcMode,
ren1.dstName, ren1.dstSha, ren1.dstMode,
......@@ -630,6 +644,8 @@ def processRenames(renamesA, renamesB, branchNameA, branchNameB):
updateFile(clean, resSha, resMode, ren1.dstName)
else:
removeFile(True, ren1.srcName)
# Renamed in 1, maybe changed in 2
if renamesA == renames1:
stage = 3
......
......@@ -161,4 +161,41 @@ test_expect_success 'pull unrenaming branch into renaming one' \
}
'
test_expect_success 'pull conflicting renames' \
'
git reset --hard
git show-branch
git pull . blue && {
echo "BAD: should have conflicted"
exit 1
}
test "$(git ls-files -u A | wc -l)" -eq 1 || {
echo "BAD: should have left a stage"
exit 1
}
test "$(git ls-files -u B | wc -l)" -eq 1 || {
echo "BAD: should have left a stage"
exit 1
}
test "$(git ls-files -u C | wc -l)" -eq 1 || {
echo "BAD: should have left a stage"
exit 1
}
test "$(git ls-files -s N | wc -l)" -eq 1 || {
echo "BAD: should have merged N"
exit 1
}
sed -ne "/^g/{
p
q
}" B | grep red || {
echo "BAD: should have listed our change first"
exit 1
}
test "$(git diff white N | wc -l)" -eq 0 || {
echo "BAD: should have taken colored branch"
exit 1
}
'
test_done
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册