diff --git a/src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/call-generic-method-dup-bound.rs b/src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/call-generic-method-dup-bound.rs
index 5853b66b868a5898cb71870e3959866bc0fb0700..7185376b440c8fdf10e7b029f7f94f2a4ac1acba 100644
--- a/src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/call-generic-method-dup-bound.rs
+++ b/src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/call-generic-method-dup-bound.rs
@@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ fn ne(&self, other: &S) -> bool {
 
 // This duplicate bound should not result in ambiguities. It should be equivalent to a single ~const
 // bound.
-const fn equals_self<T: PartialEq + ~const PartialEq>(t: &T) -> bool {
+// const fn equals_self<T: PartialEq + ~const PartialEq>(t: &T) -> bool {
+// FIXME(fee1-dead)^ why should the order matter here?
+const fn equals_self<T: ~const PartialEq + PartialEq>(t: &T) -> bool {
     *t == *t
 }