diff --git a/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc b/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc
index a3d0d996464910cf51dfe6e206e93f26fc63cd2b..309660b01fe7052de2f9300acdf00779d0228221 100644
--- a/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc
+++ b/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc
@@ -45,9 +45,10 @@ class ChunkEvalOp : public framework::OperatorWithKernel {
   }
 
  protected:
-  framework::DataType IndicateDataType(
+  framework::OpKernelType GetKernelType(
       const framework::ExecutionContext &ctx) const override {
-    return framework::DataType::FP32;
+    return framework::OpKernelType(framework::DataType::FP32,
+                                   ctx.device_context());
   }
 };
 
@@ -82,12 +83,12 @@ class ChunkEvalOpMaker : public framework::OpProtoAndCheckerMaker {
                               "See below for details.")
         .SetDefault(std::vector<int>{});
     AddComment(R"DOC(
-For some basics of chunking, please refer to 
+For some basics of chunking, please refer to
 ‘Chunking with Support Vector Mechines <https://aclanthology.info/pdf/N/N01/N01-1025.pdf>’.
 
 
-CheckEvalOp computes the precision, recall, and F1-score of chunk detection, 
-and supports IOB, IOE, IOBES and IO (also known as plain) tagging schemes. 
+CheckEvalOp computes the precision, recall, and F1-score of chunk detection,
+and supports IOB, IOE, IOBES and IO (also known as plain) tagging schemes.
 Here is a NER example of labeling for these tagging schemes:
 
  	     Li     Ming    works  at  Agricultural   Bank   of    China  in  Beijing.
@@ -96,17 +97,17 @@ Here is a NER example of labeling for these tagging schemes:
   IOE:   I-PER  E-PER   O      O   I-ORG          I-ORG  I-ORG E-ORG  O   E-LOC
   IOBES: B-PER  E-PER   O      O   I-ORG          I-ORG  I-ORG E-ORG  O   S-LOC
 
-There are three chunk types(named entity types) including PER(person), ORG(orgnazation) 
+There are three chunk types(named entity types) including PER(person), ORG(orgnazation)
 and LOC(LOCATION), and we can see that the labels have the form <tag type>-<chunk type>.
 
-Since the calculations actually use label ids rather than labels, extra attention 
-should be paid when mapping labels to ids to make CheckEvalOp work. The key point 
-is that the listed equations are satisfied by ids. 
+Since the calculations actually use label ids rather than labels, extra attention
+should be paid when mapping labels to ids to make CheckEvalOp work. The key point
+is that the listed equations are satisfied by ids.
 
     tag_type = label % num_tag_type
     chunk_type = label / num_tag_type
 
-where `num_tag_type` is the num of tag types in the tagging scheme, `num_chunk_type` 
+where `num_tag_type` is the num of tag types in the tagging scheme, `num_chunk_type`
 is the num of chunk types, and `tag_type` get its value from the following table.
 
     Scheme Begin Inside End   Single
@@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ is the num of chunk types, and `tag_type` get its value from the following table
      IOE     -     0      1     -
      IOBES   0     1      2     3
 
-Still use NER as example, assuming the tagging scheme is IOB while chunk types are ORG, 
+Still use NER as example, assuming the tagging scheme is IOB while chunk types are ORG,
 PER and LOC. To satisfy the above equations, the label map can be like this:
 
     B-ORG  0
@@ -126,9 +127,9 @@ PER and LOC. To satisfy the above equations, the label map can be like this:
     I-LOC  5
     O      6
 
-It’s not hard to verify the equations noting that the num of chunk types 
-is 3 and the num of tag types in IOB scheme is 2. For example, the label 
-id of I-LOC is 5, the tag type id of I-LOC is 1, and the chunk type id of 
+It’s not hard to verify the equations noting that the num of chunk types
+is 3 and the num of tag types in IOB scheme is 2. For example, the label
+id of I-LOC is 5, the tag type id of I-LOC is 1, and the chunk type id of
 I-LOC is 2, which consistent with the results from the equations.
 )DOC");
   }