Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 06 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 05 2月, 2013 9 次提交
    • D
      ipcomp: Mark as netns_ok. · 27000929
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      This module is namespace aware, netns_ok was just disabled by default
for sanity.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      27000929
    • J
      mcast: do not check 'rv' twice in a row · 56db1c5f
      由 Jean Sacren 提交于 
      With the loop, don't check 'rv' twice in a row. Without the loop, 'rv'
doesn't even need to be checked.

Make the comment more grammar-friendly.
Signed-off-by: NJean Sacren <sakiwit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      56db1c5f
    • Y
      net: remove redundant check for timer pending state before del_timer · 25cc4ae9
      由 Ying Xue 提交于 
      As in del_timer() there has already placed a timer_pending() function
to check whether the timer to be deleted is pending or not, it's
unnecessary to check timer pending state again before del_timer() is
called.
Signed-off-by: NYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      25cc4ae9
    • D
      sctp: sctp_close: fix release of bindings for deferred call_rcu's · 8c98653f
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      It seems due to RCU usage, i.e. within SCTP's address binding list,
a, say, ``behavioral change'' was introduced which does actually
not conform to the RFC anymore. In particular consider the following
(fictional) scenario to demonstrate this:

  do:
    Two SOCK_SEQPACKET-style sockets are opened (S1, S2)
    S1 is bound to 127.0.0.1, port 1024 [server]
    S2 is bound to 127.0.0.1, port 1025 [client]
    listen(2) is invoked on S1
    From S2 we call one sendmsg(2) with msg.msg_name and
       msg.msg_namelen parameters set to the server's
       address
    S1, S2 are closed
    goto do

The first pass of this loop passes successful, while the second round
fails during binding of S1 (address still in use). What is happening?
In the first round, the initial handshake is being done, and, at the
time close(2) is called on S1, a non-graceful shutdown is performed via
ABORT since in S1's receive queue an unprocessed packet is present,
thus stating an error condition. This can be considered as a correct
behavior.

During close also all bound addresses are freed, thus nothing *must*
be active anymore. In reference to RFC2960:

  After checking the Verification Tag, the receiving endpoint shall
  remove the association from its record, and shall report the
  termination to its upper layer. (9.1 Abort of an Association)

Also, no half-open states are supported, thus after an ungraceful
shutdown, we leave nothing behind. However, this seems not to be
happening though. In a real-world scenario, this is exactly where
it breaks the lksctp-tools functional test suite, *for instance*:

  ./test_sockopt
  test_sockopt.c  1 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) on a socket with no assoc
  test_sockopt.c  2 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS)
  test_sockopt.c  3 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) with invalid associd
  test_sockopt.c  4 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) with NULL associd
  test_sockopt.c  5 BROK : bind: Address already in use

The underlying problem is that sctp_endpoint_destroy() hasn't been
triggered yet while the next bind attempt is being done. It will be
triggered eventually (but too late) by sctp_transport_destroy_rcu()
after one RCU grace period:

  sctp_transport_destroy()
    sctp_transport_destroy_rcu() ----.
      sctp_association_put() [*]  <--+--> sctp_packet_free()
        sctp_association_destroy()          [...]
          sctp_endpoint_put()                 skb->destructor
            sctp_endpoint_destroy()             sctp_wfree()
              sctp_bind_addr_free()               sctp_association_put() [*]

Thus, we move out the condition with sctp_association_put() as well as
the sctp_packet_free() invocation and the issue can be solved. We also
better free the SCTP chunks first before putting the ref of the association.

With this patch, the example above (which simulates a similar scenario
as in the implementation of this test case) and therefore also the test
suite run successfully through. Tested by myself.

Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8c98653f
    • G
      netns: bridge: allow unprivileged users add/delete mdb entry · e4d343ea
      由 Gao feng 提交于 
      since the mdb table is belong to bridge device,and the
bridge device can only be seen in one netns.
So it's safe to allow unprivileged user which is the
creator of userns and netns to modify the mdb table.
Signed-off-by: NGao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e4d343ea
    • G
      netns: ebtable: allow unprivileged users to operate ebtables · bb12b8b2
      由 Gao feng 提交于 
      ebt_table is a private resource of netns, operating ebtables
in one netns will not affect other netns, we can allow the
creator user of userns and netns to change the ebtables.
Signed-off-by: NGao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bb12b8b2
    • G
      netns: fdb: allow unprivileged users to add/del fdb entries · c5c35108
      由 Gao feng 提交于 
      Right now,only ixgdb,macvlan,vxlan and bridge implement
fdb_add/fdb_del operations.

these operations only operate the private data of net
device. So allowing the unprivileged users who creates
the userns and netns to add/del fdb entries will do no
harm to other netns.
Signed-off-by: NGao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c5c35108
    • V
      tcp: ipv6: Update MIB counters for drops · 5f1e942c
      由 Vijay Subramanian 提交于 
      This patch updates LINUX_MIB_LISTENDROPS and LINUX_MIB_LISTENOVERFLOWS in
tcp_v6_conn_request() and tcp_v6_err(). tcp_v6_conn_request() in particular can
drop SYNs for various reasons which are not currently tracked.
Signed-off-by: NVijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5f1e942c
    • V
      tcp: Update MIB counters for drops · 848bf15f
      由 Vijay Subramanian 提交于 
      This patch updates LINUX_MIB_LISTENDROPS in tcp_v4_conn_request() and
tcp_v4_err(). tcp_v4_conn_request() in particular can drop SYNs for various
reasons which are not currently tracked.
Signed-off-by: NVijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      848bf15f
  5. 04 2月, 2013 4 次提交
  7. 01 2月, 2013 6 次提交
  9. 31 1月, 2013 5 次提交
  11. 30 1月, 2013 15 次提交