Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 09 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 05 5月, 2016 13 次提交
  5. 28 4月, 2016 8 次提交
  7. 25 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 24 4月, 2016 11 次提交
  11. 23 4月, 2016 5 次提交
    • X
      sched/deadline: Fix a bug in dl_overflow() · fec148c0
      由 Xunlei Pang 提交于 
      I got a minus(very big) dl_b->total_bw during my deadline tests.

    # grep dl /proc/sched_debug
    dl_rq[0]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : -222297900

Something unusual must have happened.

After some digging, I finally noticed that when changing a deadline
task to normal(cfs), and changing it back to deadline immediately,
after it died, we will got the wrong dl_bw->total_bw.

The root cause is in dl_overflow(), it has:
    if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
	return 0;

1) When a deadline task is changed to !deadline task, it will start
   dl timer in switched_from_dl(), and retain previous deadline parameter
   till the timer expires.

2) If we change it back to deadline with the same bandwidth parameter
   before the timer expires, as it keeps the old bandwidth although it
   is not a deadline task. dl_overflow() simply returns success without
   updating the right data, and got the wrong dl_bw->total_bw.

The solution is simple, if @p is not deadline, don't return.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460636368-1993-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      fec148c0
    • F
      sched/fair: Optimize !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON CPU load updates · 9fd81dd5
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      Some code in CPU load update only concern NO_HZ configs but it is
built on all configurations. When NO_HZ isn't built, that code is harmless
but just happens to take some useless ressources in CPU and memory:

1) one useless field in struct rq
2) jiffies record on every tick that is never used (cpu_load_update_periodic)
3) decay_load_missed is called two times on every tick to eventually
   return immediately with no action taken. And that function is dead
   code.

For pure optimization purposes, lets conditionally build the NO_HZ
related code.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461080211-16271-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      9fd81dd5
    • F
      sched/fair: Correctly handle nohz ticks CPU load accounting · 1f41906a
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      Ticks can happen while the CPU is in dynticks-idle or dynticks-singletask
mode. In fact "nohz" or "dynticks" only mean that we exit the periodic
mode and we try to minimize the ticks as much as possible. The nohz
subsystem uses a confusing terminology with the internal state
"ts->tick_stopped" which is also available through its public interface
with tick_nohz_tick_stopped(). This is a misnomer as the tick is instead
reduced with the best effort rather than stopped. In the best case the
tick can indeed be actually stopped but there is no guarantee about that.
If a timer needs to fire one second later, a tick will fire while the
CPU is in nohz mode and this is a very common scenario.

Now this confusion happens to be a problem with CPU load updates:
cpu_load_update_active() doesn't handle nohz ticks correctly because it
assumes that ticks are completely stopped in nohz mode and that
cpu_load_update_active() can't be called in dynticks mode. When that
happens, the whole previous tickless load is ignored and the function
just records the load for the current tick, ignoring potentially long
idle periods behind.

In order to solve this, we could account the current load for the
previous nohz time but there is a risk that we account the load of a
task that got freshly enqueued for the whole nohz period.

So instead, lets record the dynticks load on nohz frame entry so we know
what to record in case of nohz ticks, then use this record to account
the tickless load on nohz ticks and nohz frame end.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460555812-25375-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      1f41906a
    • F
      sched/fair: Gather CPU load functions under a more conventional namespace · cee1afce
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      The CPU load update related functions have a weak naming convention
currently, starting with update_cpu_load_*() which isn't ideal as
"update" is a very generic concept.

Since two of these functions are public already (and a third is to come)
that's enough to introduce a more conventional naming scheme. So let's
do the following rename instead:

	update_cpu_load_*() -> cpu_load_update_*()
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460555812-25375-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      cee1afce
    • S
      sched/fair: Call cpufreq hook in additional paths · a2c6c91f
      由 Steve Muckle 提交于 
      The cpufreq hook should be called any time the root CFS rq utilization
changes. This can occur when a task is switched to or from the fair
class, or a task moves between groups or CPUs, but these paths
currently do not call the cpufreq hook.

Fix this by adding the hook to attach_entity_load_avg() and
detach_entity_load_avg().
Suggested-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
[ Added the .update_freq argument to update_cfs_rq_load_avg() to avoid a double cpufreq call. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1458858367-2831-1-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      a2c6c91f