staging: kpc2000: added separate show functions for kpc_uio_class device...
staging: kpc2000: added separate show functions for kpc_uio_class device attributes, defined them as read-only and declared them static. Defined separate simple show functions for each attribute instead of having a one big one containing a chain of conditionals. Replaced scnprintf calls with sprintf since all the outputs are short bounded strings or single integers. All of the device attributes are read-only, so used DEVICE_ATTR_RO to define them. The definitions are only used to populate the kpc_uio_class_attrs attribute array, so declared them as static. Fixes the following sparse warnings: drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:220:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_offset' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:221:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_size' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:222:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_type' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:223:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_s2c_dma' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:224:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_c2s_dma' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:225:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_irq_count' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:226:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_irq_base_num' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:227:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_core_num' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NJeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录