提交 a2d812a2 编写于 作者: T Tejun Heo

workqueue: Make worker_attach/detach_pool() update worker->pool

For historical reasons, the worker attach/detach functions don't
currently manage worker->pool and the callers are manually and
inconsistently updating it.

This patch moves worker->pool updates into the worker attach/detach
functions.  This makes worker->pool consistent and clearly defines how
worker->pool updates are synchronized.

This will help later workqueue visibility improvements by allowing
safe access to workqueue information from worker->task.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
上级 1258fae7
......@@ -1741,6 +1741,7 @@ static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers);
worker->pool = pool;
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
}
......@@ -1748,19 +1749,21 @@ static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
/**
* worker_detach_from_pool() - detach a worker from its pool
* @worker: worker which is attached to its pool
* @pool: the pool @worker is attached to
*
* Undo the attaching which had been done in worker_attach_to_pool(). The
* caller worker shouldn't access to the pool after detached except it has
* other reference to the pool.
*/
static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker,
struct worker_pool *pool)
static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker)
{
struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
struct completion *detach_completion = NULL;
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
list_del(&worker->node);
worker->pool = NULL;
if (list_empty(&pool->workers))
detach_completion = pool->detach_completion;
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
......@@ -1799,7 +1802,6 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
if (!worker)
goto fail;
worker->pool = pool;
worker->id = id;
if (pool->cpu >= 0)
......@@ -2236,7 +2238,7 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
set_task_comm(worker->task, "kworker/dying");
ida_simple_remove(&pool->worker_ida, worker->id);
worker_detach_from_pool(worker, pool);
worker_detach_from_pool(worker);
kfree(worker);
return 0;
}
......@@ -2367,7 +2369,6 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer)
worker_attach_to_pool(rescuer, pool);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
rescuer->pool = pool;
/*
* Slurp in all works issued via this workqueue and
......@@ -2417,10 +2418,9 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer)
if (need_more_worker(pool))
wake_up_worker(pool);
rescuer->pool = NULL;
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
worker_detach_from_pool(rescuer, pool);
worker_detach_from_pool(rescuer);
spin_lock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock);
}
......
......@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct worker {
/* 64 bytes boundary on 64bit, 32 on 32bit */
struct task_struct *task; /* I: worker task */
struct worker_pool *pool; /* I: the associated pool */
struct worker_pool *pool; /* A: the associated pool */
/* L: for rescuers */
struct list_head node; /* A: anchored at pool->workers */
/* A: runs through worker->node */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册