From 49e226323d462785582750d9f38acca5ffa5dd48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:35:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Reverse the disable sequence in regulator_bulk_disable() Often there is a need for disabling a set of regulators in order opposite to the enable order. Currently the function regulator_bulk_disable() walks list of regulators in same order as regulator_bulk_enable(). This may cause trouble, especially for devices with mixed analogue and digital circuits. So reverse the disabling sequence of regulator_bulk_disable(). While at it, also correct the comment. Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index ca86f39a0fdc..daba2f60f7d9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_bulk_enable); * @return 0 on success, an errno on failure * * This convenience API allows consumers to disable multiple regulator - * clients in a single API call. If any consumers cannot be enabled - * then any others that were disabled will be disabled again prior to + * clients in a single API call. If any consumers cannot be disabled + * then any others that were disabled will be enabled again prior to * return. */ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers, @@ -2473,7 +2473,7 @@ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers, int i; int ret; - for (i = 0; i < num_consumers; i++) { + for (i = num_consumers - 1; i >= 0; --i) { ret = regulator_disable(consumers[i].consumer); if (ret != 0) goto err; @@ -2483,7 +2483,7 @@ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers, err: pr_err("Failed to disable %s: %d\n", consumers[i].supply, ret); - for (--i; i >= 0; --i) + for (++i; i < num_consumers; ++i) regulator_enable(consumers[i].consumer); return ret; -- GitLab