From 15e7facb7b428f5f0dac3ee85ecb519a46caaa34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 16:11:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pull assert_forcewake_active() underneath the lock Make no assumption that something in the background is not acquiring the fw_domain -- but we still do not track owner so assume that any active domain is intended by the caller. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190707151135.11700-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c index bb9e0da30e94..5f0367fd3200 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c @@ -747,6 +747,8 @@ void assert_forcewakes_active(struct intel_uncore *uncore, if (!uncore->funcs.force_wake_get) return; + spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock); + assert_rpm_wakelock_held(uncore->rpm); fw_domains &= uncore->fw_domains; @@ -770,6 +772,8 @@ void assert_forcewakes_active(struct intel_uncore *uncore, domain->id, actual)) break; } + + spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock); } /* We give fast paths for the really cool registers */ -- GitLab