From b04bdf1290c0a7655c72ef481d150f110b6af3a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:08:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Reduce ReleaseLruFile failure from FATAL to ERROR grade; offhand I don't see that this should be a worse way to fail to open a file than any other. --- src/backend/storage/file/fd.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/file/fd.c b/src/backend/storage/file/fd.c index 8dc82844d5..58612be9e0 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/file/fd.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/file/fd.c @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ * Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California * * IDENTIFICATION - * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/file/fd.c,v 1.50 1999/10/17 23:09:02 tgl Exp $ + * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/file/fd.c,v 1.51 1999/11/23 01:08:36 tgl Exp $ * * NOTES: * @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ ReleaseLruFile() DO_DB(elog(DEBUG, "ReleaseLruFile. Opened %d", nfile)); if (nfile <= 0) - elog(FATAL, "ReleaseLruFile: No opened files - no one can be closed"); + elog(ERROR, "ReleaseLruFile: No open files available to be closed"); /* * There are opened files and so there should be at least one used vfd -- GitLab