From 1323874389030c55fb053fead12ca1c6654d8851 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhushengle <star_rain@tom.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 11:00:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix: Sortlink, the response time to insert the node should be
 inserted into the back of the existing node.

Close #I3PSJ8

Change-Id: Ib630ba4febbc21d4f25af0961f5c996eadf4e054
---
 kernel/base/core/los_sortlink.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/base/core/los_sortlink.c b/kernel/base/core/los_sortlink.c
index bca4e570..8a997e50 100644
--- a/kernel/base/core/los_sortlink.c
+++ b/kernel/base/core/los_sortlink.c
@@ -55,10 +55,14 @@ STATIC INLINE VOID OsAddNode2SortLink(SortLinkAttribute *sortLinkHeader, SortLin
     }
 
     SortLinkList *listSorted = LOS_DL_LIST_ENTRY(head->pstNext, SortLinkList, sortLinkNode);
-    if (listSorted->responseTime >= sortList->responseTime) {
+    if (listSorted->responseTime > sortList->responseTime) {
         LOS_ListAdd(head, &sortList->sortLinkNode);
         sortLinkHeader->nodeNum++;
         return;
+    } else if (listSorted->responseTime == sortList->responseTime) {
+        LOS_ListAdd(head->pstNext, &sortList->sortLinkNode);
+        sortLinkHeader->nodeNum++;
+        return;
     }
 
     LOS_DL_LIST *prevNode = head->pstPrev;
-- 
GitLab