- 12 6月, 2009 40 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Missing conversion to host-endian before doing shifts Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
* get minix_write_inode() to honour the second argument * now we can use simple_fsync() for minixfs Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
kill ext2_sync_file() (along with ext2/fsync.c), get rid of ext2_update_inode() - it's an alias of ext2_write_inode(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
* mark directory data blocks as assoc. metadata * add new inode to deal with FAT, mark FAT blocks as assoc. metadata of that * now ->fsync() is trivial both for files and directories Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
fs-internal parts of qnx4_fs.h taken to fs/qnx4/qnx4.h, includes adjusted, qnx4_fs.h doesn't need unifdef anymore. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
* have directory operations use mark_buffer_dirty_inode(), so that sync_mapping_buffers() would get those. * make qnx4_write_inode() honour its last argument. * get rid of insane copies of very ancient "walk the indirect blocks" in qnx4/fsync - they never matched the actual fs layout and, fortunately, never'd been called. Again, all this junk is not needed; ->fsync() should just do sync_mapping_buffers + sync_inode (and if we implement block allocation for qnx4, we'll need to use mark_buffer_dirty_inode() for extent blocks) Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
writes associated buffers, then does sync_inode() to write the inode itself (and to make it clean). Depends on ->write_inode() honouring the second argument. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Alessio Igor Bogani 提交于
[xfs, btrfs, capifs, shmem don't need BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by: NAlessio Igor Bogani <abogani@texware.it> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
I think the block_dump output in __mark_inode_dirty is missing dentry locking. Surely the i_dentry list can change any time, so we may not even *get* a dentry there. If we do get one by chance, then it would appear to be able to go away or get renamed at any time... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
Some filesystems can call in to sync an inode that is still in the I_NEW state (eg. ext family, when mounted with -osync). This is OK because the filesystem has sole access to the new inode, so it can modify i_state without races (because no other thread should be modifying it, by definition of I_NEW). Ie. a false positive, so remove the warnings. The races are described here 7ef0d737, which is also where the warnings were introduced. Reported-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Mike Frysinger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
the write_super method is used for (1) writing back the superblock periodically from pdflush (2) called just before ->sync_fs for data integerity syncs We don't need (1) because we have our own peridoc writeout through xfssyncd, and we don't need (2) because xfs_fs_sync_fs performs a proper synchronous superblock writeout after all other data and metadata has been written out. Also remove ->s_dirt tracking as it's only used to decide when too call ->write_super. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
This should not trigger anymore, so kill it. Acked-by: NAnton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The only user of the i_cindex element in the inode structure is used is by the firewire drivers. As part of an attempt to slim down the inode structure to save memory --- since a typical Linux system will have hundreds of thousands if not millions of inodes cached, a reduction in the size inode has high leverage. The firewire driver does not need i_cindex in any fast path, so it's simple enough to calculate when it is needed, instead of wasting space in the inode structure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: krh@redhat.com Cc: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Push down lock_super into ->write_super instances and remove it from the caller. Following filesystem don't need ->s_lock in ->write_super and are skipped: * bfs, nilfs2 - no other uses of s_lock and have internal locks in ->write_super * ext2 - uses BKL in ext2_write_super and has internal calls without s_lock * reiserfs - no other uses of s_lock as has reiserfs_write_lock (BKL) in ->write_super * xfs - no other uses of s_lock and uses internal lock (buffer lock on superblock buffer) to serialize ->write_super. Also xfs_fs_write_super is superflous and will go away in the next merge window Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
jffs2_write_super is only called from super.c and doesn't use any functionality from fs.c. So move it over to super.c and make it static there. [should go in through the vfs tree as it is a requirement for the next patch] Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
[folded fix from Jiri Slaby] Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Note that since we can't run into contention between remount_fs and write_super (due to exclusion on s_umount), we have to care only about filesystems that touch lock_super() on their own. Out of those ext3, ext4, hpfs, sysv and ufs do need it; fat doesn't since its ->remount_fs() only accesses assign-once data (basically, it's "we have no atime on directories and only have atime on files for vfat; force nodiratime and possibly noatime into *flags"). [folded a build fix from hch] Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller. A couple of filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs, hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment. Most of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually. Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area. [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super() now] [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We can't run into contention on it. All other callers of lock_super() either hold s_umount (and we have it exclusive) or hold an active reference to superblock in question, which prevents the call of generic_shutdown_super() while the reference is held. So we can replace lock_super(s) with get_fs_excl() in generic_shutdown_super() (and corresponding change for unlock_super(), of course). Since ext4 expects s_lock held for its put_super, take lock_super() into it. The rest of filesystems do not care at all. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
do_remount_sb() is fs/internal.h fodder, fsync_no_super() is long gone. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Make sure a superblock really is writeable by checking MS_RDONLY under s_umount. sync_filesystems needed some re-arragement for that, but all but one sync_filesystem caller had the correct locking already so that we could add that check there. cachefiles grew s_umount locking. I've also added a WARN_ON to sync_filesystem to assert this for future callers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Merge the write_super helper into sync_super and move the check for ->write_super earlier so that we can avoid grabbing a reference to a superblock that doesn't have it. While we're at it also add a little comment documenting sync_supers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
d_unlinked() will be used in middle-term to ban checkpointing when opened but unlinked file is detected, and in long term, to detect such situation and special case on it. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
We just did a full fs writeout using sync_filesystem before, and if that's not enough for the filesystem it can perform it's own writeout in ->put_super, which many filesystems already do. Move a call to foofs_write_super into every foofs_put_super for now to guarantee identical behaviour until it's cleaned up by the individual filesystem maintainers. Exceptions: - affs already has identical copy & pasted code at the beginning of affs_put_super so no need to do it twice. - xfs does the right thing without it and I have changes pending for the xfs tree touching this are so I don't really need conflicts here.. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-