tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority
Currently it ignores operator priority and just sets processed args as a right operand. But it could result in priority inversion in case that the right operand is also a operator arg and its priority is lower. For example, following print format is from new kmem events. "page=%p", REC->pfn != -1UL ? (((struct page *)(0xffffea0000000000UL)) + (REC->pfn)) : ((void *)0) But this was treated as below: REC->pfn != ((null - 1UL) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0) In this case, the right arg was '?' operator which has lower priority. But it just sets the whole arg so making the output confusing - page was always 0 or 1 since that's the result of logical operation. With this patch, it can handle it properly like following: ((REC->pfn != (null - 1UL)) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0) Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428298576-9785-10-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org [ Replaced 'swap' with 'rotate' in a comment as requested by Steve and agreed by Namhyung ] Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录