提交 64f9f406 编写于 作者: M Matt Caswell

Handle SSL_shutdown while in init more appropriately #2

Previous commit 7bb196a7 attempted to "fix" a problem with the way
SSL_shutdown() behaved whilst in mid-handshake. The original behaviour had
SSL_shutdown() return immediately having taken no action if called mid-
handshake with a return value of 1 (meaning everything was shutdown
successfully). In fact the shutdown has not been successful.

Commit 7bb196a7 changed that to send a close_notify anyway and then
return. This seems to be causing some problems for some applications so
perhaps a better (much simpler) approach is revert to the previous
behaviour (no attempt at a shutdown), but return -1 (meaning the shutdown
was not successful).

This also fixes a bug where SSL_shutdown always returns 0 when shutdown
*very* early in the handshake (i.e. we are still using SSLv23_method).
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
上级 a173a7ee
......@@ -1993,7 +1993,6 @@ void ERR_load_SSL_strings(void);
# define SSL_F_SSL3_SETUP_KEY_BLOCK 157
# define SSL_F_SSL3_SETUP_READ_BUFFER 156
# define SSL_F_SSL3_SETUP_WRITE_BUFFER 291
# define SSL_F_SSL3_SHUTDOWN 396
# define SSL_F_SSL3_WRITE_BYTES 158
# define SSL_F_SSL3_WRITE_PENDING 159
# define SSL_F_SSL_ACCEPT 390
......
......@@ -4327,21 +4327,6 @@ int ssl3_shutdown(SSL *s)
return (ret);
}
} else if (!(s->shutdown & SSL_RECEIVED_SHUTDOWN)) {
if (SSL_in_init(s)) {
/*
* We can't shutdown properly if we are in the middle of a
* handshake. Doing so is problematic because the peer may send a
* CCS before it acts on our close_notify. However we should not
* continue to process received handshake messages or CCS once our
* close_notify has been sent. Therefore any close_notify from
* the peer will be unreadable because we have not moved to the next
* cipher state. Its best just to avoid this can-of-worms. Return
* an error if we are wanting to wait for a close_notify from the
* peer and we are in init.
*/
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_SHUTDOWN, SSL_R_SHUTDOWN_WHILE_IN_INIT);
return -1;
}
/*
* If we are waiting for a close from our peer, we are closed
*/
......
......@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ static ERR_STRING_DATA SSL_str_functs[] = {
{ERR_FUNC(SSL_F_SSL3_SETUP_KEY_BLOCK), "ssl3_setup_key_block"},
{ERR_FUNC(SSL_F_SSL3_SETUP_READ_BUFFER), "ssl3_setup_read_buffer"},
{ERR_FUNC(SSL_F_SSL3_SETUP_WRITE_BUFFER), "ssl3_setup_write_buffer"},
{ERR_FUNC(SSL_F_SSL3_SHUTDOWN), "ssl3_shutdown"},
{ERR_FUNC(SSL_F_SSL3_WRITE_BYTES), "ssl3_write_bytes"},
{ERR_FUNC(SSL_F_SSL3_WRITE_PENDING), "ssl3_write_pending"},
{ERR_FUNC(SSL_F_SSL_ACCEPT), "SSL_accept"},
......
......@@ -1578,6 +1578,7 @@ int SSL_shutdown(SSL *s)
return -1;
}
if (!SSL_in_init(s)) {
if((s->mode & SSL_MODE_ASYNC) && ASYNC_get_current_job() == NULL) {
struct ssl_async_args args;
......@@ -1589,8 +1590,10 @@ int SSL_shutdown(SSL *s)
} else {
return s->method->ssl_shutdown(s);
}
return s->method->ssl_shutdown(s);
} else {
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL_SHUTDOWN, SSL_R_SHUTDOWN_WHILE_IN_INIT);
return -1;
}
}
int SSL_renegotiate(SSL *s)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册