提交 61df9d91 编写于 作者: N NeilBrown 提交者: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] md: make messages about resync/recovery etc more specific

It is possible to request a 'check' of an md/raid array where the whole array
is read and consistancies are reported.

This uses the same mechanisms as 'resync' and so reports in the kernel logs
that a resync is being started.  This understandably confuses/worries people.

Also the text in /proc/mdstat suggests a 'resync' is happen when it is just a
check.

This patch changes those messages to be more specific about what is happening.
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 f022b2fd
......@@ -4641,8 +4641,10 @@ static void status_resync(struct seq_file *seq, mddev_t * mddev)
seq_printf(seq, " %s =%3u.%u%% (%llu/%llu)",
(test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery)?
"reshape" :
(test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery)?
"check" :
(test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery) ?
"resync" : "recovery")),
"resync" : "recovery"))),
per_milli/10, per_milli % 10,
(unsigned long long) resync,
(unsigned long long) max_blocks);
......@@ -5032,6 +5034,7 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
int skipped = 0;
struct list_head *rtmp;
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
char *desc;
/* just incase thread restarts... */
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery))
......@@ -5039,6 +5042,18 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
if (mddev->ro) /* never try to sync a read-only array */
return;
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery)) {
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery))
desc = "data-check";
else if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery))
desc = "requested-resync";
else
desc = "resync";
} else if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery))
desc = "reshape";
else
desc = "recovery";
/* we overload curr_resync somewhat here.
* 0 == not engaged in resync at all
* 2 == checking that there is no conflict with another sync
......@@ -5082,10 +5097,10 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
prepare_to_wait(&resync_wait, &wq, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (!kthread_should_stop() &&
mddev2->curr_resync >= mddev->curr_resync) {
printk(KERN_INFO "md: delaying resync of %s"
" until %s has finished resync (they"
printk(KERN_INFO "md: delaying %s of %s"
" until %s has finished (they"
" share one or more physical units)\n",
mdname(mddev), mdname(mddev2));
desc, mdname(mddev), mdname(mddev2));
mddev_put(mddev2);
schedule();
finish_wait(&resync_wait, &wq);
......@@ -5121,12 +5136,12 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
j = rdev->recovery_offset;
}
printk(KERN_INFO "md: syncing RAID array %s\n", mdname(mddev));
printk(KERN_INFO "md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed:"
" %d KB/sec/disc.\n", speed_min(mddev));
printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s of RAID array %s\n", desc, mdname(mddev));
printk(KERN_INFO "md: minimum _guaranteed_ speed:"
" %d KB/sec/disk.\n", speed_min(mddev));
printk(KERN_INFO "md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth "
"(but not more than %d KB/sec) for reconstruction.\n",
speed_max(mddev));
"(but not more than %d KB/sec) for %s.\n",
speed_max(mddev), desc);
is_mddev_idle(mddev); /* this also initializes IO event counters */
......@@ -5152,8 +5167,8 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
if (j>2) {
printk(KERN_INFO
"md: resuming recovery of %s from checkpoint.\n",
mdname(mddev));
"md: resuming %s of %s from checkpoint.\n",
desc, mdname(mddev));
mddev->curr_resync = j;
}
......@@ -5236,7 +5251,7 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
}
}
}
printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s: sync done.\n",mdname(mddev));
printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s: %s done.\n",mdname(mddev), desc);
/*
* this also signals 'finished resyncing' to md_stop
*/
......@@ -5256,8 +5271,8 @@ void md_do_sync(mddev_t *mddev)
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery)) {
if (mddev->curr_resync >= mddev->recovery_cp) {
printk(KERN_INFO
"md: checkpointing recovery of %s.\n",
mdname(mddev));
"md: checkpointing %s of %s.\n",
desc, mdname(mddev));
mddev->recovery_cp = mddev->curr_resync;
}
} else
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册